Libertarian Outreach to Arab and Islamic Communities in North Carolina

by: Phil Jacobson and Wael Masri

Arab and Islamic communities have deep roots in both the original cultures from which they draw their identities as well as North Carolina’s broad cultural mosaic. Bound by shared cultural, religious, and entrepreneurial ties, these communities are becoming increasingly politically active, particularly in light of the ongoing crisis in Palestine, yet remain politically underserved. Socialist groups have sought to align themselves with the cause of Palestinian human rights; however, t. contrary to the socialist narrative, these groups are not inherently drawn to collectivist ideologies. In fact, their values, experiences, and aspirations align far more closely with libertarian principles—individual liberty, free markets, and non-aggression. There is a profound opportunity for libertarians to step forward and build bridges with Arab and Islamic communities in North Carolina.

A Community of Entrepreneurs, Not Socialists

A striking characteristic of Arab and Islamic communities in North Carolina is their entrepreneurial spirit. From small grocery stores and restaurants to tech startups and professional services, many members of these communities are deeply invested in private enterprise. This economic independence fosters a natural appreciation for free markets, individual initiative, and limited government intervention—core tenets of libertarianism. Unlike socialist groups that advocate for heavy-handed state control, these communities understand the value of self-reliance and the power of voluntary exchange.

Arab-Americans, particularly those with roots in the Eastern Mediterranean, trace their heritage back to the ancient Phoenicians—renowned seafaring traders who pioneered international commerce and innovation. This legacy of economic freedom and self-determination continues to shape the values of Arab and Islamic communities today.

Moreover, their experiences in North America have shown that they are more likely to collaborate with other religious groups—such as Jewish communities advocating for Kosher standards or religious education—than with secular socialists who often oppose such freedoms. This alignment on issues of religious liberty, educational choice, and cultural autonomy underscores a shared commitment to individual rights and voluntary cooperation, rather than top-down mandates.

Escaping Authoritarianism, Embracing Liberty

Many members of these communities have fled authoritarian regimes in the Middle East and South Asia, seeking refuge in the United States precisely because of its promise of freedom and opportunity. Having experienced the oppressive nature of centralized power, they are deeply skeptical of authoritarian solutions, whether in the form of socialism or fascism. This makes them unlikely allies for socialist movements, despite the latter’s attempts to co-opt their causes.

Libertarians, on the other hand, can offer a compelling alternative: a vision of society rooted in individual liberty, free markets, and non-aggression. By emphasizing personal freedom, property rights, and voluntary association, libertarian messaging can resonate with these communities in ways that socialists can never replicate.

A Natural Fit: Non-Interventionism

One of the most compelling areas of alignment between Arab and Muslim-Americans and the Libertarian Party is the principle of non-interventionism. This principle, deeply rooted in libertarian philosophy, advocates for a foreign policy that prioritizes peace, diplomacy, and respect for the sovereignty of all nations. It stands in stark contrast to the interventionist policies that have characterized much of U.S. foreign policy in recent decades, particularly in the Middle East.

Many members of Arab and Muslim-American communities have firsthand experience with the devastating consequences of U.S. interventionism, especially those who come from Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, and Palestine.  Gaza is part of Palestine, which is culturally and religiously central to Arabs and Muslims, and it’s still suffering from the ongoing Israeli military action inflicted upon them with the complicity of the US government.  A central tenet of libertarianism is that the means do not justify the ends, and Kenneth Roth of Human Rights Watch explains in this interview that the genocide in Gaza is being carried out as a means (rather than as an intrinsic end, though various Israeli political leaders have called for it) to depopulate the area from its indigenous Palestinians and to make the area unlivable for them (hence the mass destruction of hospitals, home, and all civilian infrastructure).  While it is natural for some readers to want to reject the label of genocide there, that term has been accepted by leading international scholars on this topic, including Israeli professors of the Holocaust, as well as by governments around the world.

U.S. military engagements exacerbate instability, fuel anti-American sentiment, and displace millions of people. These interventions have not only failed to achieve their stated goals but have also created a legacy of distrust and resentment among the populations affected.

Libertarian icon Dr. Ron Paul, congressman and three-time presidential candidate, has been a vocal critic of U.S. interventionism in the Middle East. In his speeches and writings, Dr. Paul consistently argued that such interventions are not only morally wrong but also counterproductive. During his 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns, he highlighted the unintended consequences of U.S. foreign policy, including the rise of extremist groups and the erosion of civil liberties at home. Arab and Muslim-Americans are acutely aware of the human and economic costs of interventionism, making them natural proponents of a foreign policy that prioritizes diplomacy, trade, and non-aggression.

The Libertarian Party’s commitment to non-interventionism offers a refreshing alternative to the imperialist agendas of both the Democratic and Republican parties. By advocating for a foreign policy that respects the sovereignty of all nations and avoids entangling alliances, libertarians can appeal to Arab and Muslim-Americans who are disillusioned with the bipartisan consensus on endless wars.

The Current Void: Libertarian Absence in Political Discourse

Despite the natural alignment between libertarian ideals and the values of Arab and Islamic communities, libertarian voices have been conspicuously absent from the political discourse surrounding issues like the crisis in Palestine. At rallies and marches, socialist groups dominate the conversation, leaving these communities with no alternative but to listen to collectivist, anti-business rhetoric. This represents a missed opportunity for libertarians to engage with a politically active and increasingly influential demographic.

Libertarians have a unique opportunity to step into this void by articulating a principled stance on human rights, non-interventionism, and the dangers of authoritarianism, as well as free markets and self-determination. By doing so, they can provide a voice for Arab and Islamic communities who align with these ideals, both at home and abroad.

Building Bridges: A Path Forward

To connect with these communities, libertarians must engage in meaningful outreach. This means showing up at community events, listening to their concerns, and demonstrating how libertarian principles align with their values. It also means highlighting the failures of authoritarian socialism while offering a positive vision of a free and prosperous society.

One practical step that libertarians could take immediately is partnering with local business owners and religious leaders to advocate for policies that promote economic freedom, religious liberty, and educational choice. By standing alongside these communities on issues that matter to them, libertarians can build trust and demonstrate their commitment to individual rights and limited government.

Conclusion: A Natural Alliance Waiting to Be Forged

Arab and Islamic communities in North Carolina represent a politically underserved yet highly engaged demographic. Their entrepreneurial spirit, commitment to religious freedom, rejection of authoritarianism, and support for non-interventionism make them natural allies for libertarians. However, this alliance will not materialize on its own. Libertarians must actively reach out, listen, and articulate a vision of freedom that resonates with these communities.

In a time of heightened political polarization, libertarians have the opportunity to build bridges with groups that share their values but have yet to hear their message. By doing so, they can expand their coalition, advance the cause of liberty, and offer a compelling alternative to the authoritarianism of both the left and the right. The time to act is now.