
Amend NC Constitution to protect property rights
By Brian Irving, LPNC Press Secretary
DURHAM (Jan. 19) -Libertarians support an amendment to the North
Carolina State Constitution to strengthen protection for property rights
in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Kelo vs. New London.
The party's executive committee passed a resolution Jan. 14 calling on
the General Assembly to submit to the voters an amendment to the state
constitution prohibiting seizure of private property to benefit private
interests to the voter.
"The protection of private property rights against government seizures
and other unreasonable government interference was a fundamental principle
and core commitment of our nation's founders," the resolution says.
The resolution noted that following the Kelo decision "government may
seize the private property of one owner, and transfer that same property
to another private owner, simply by concluding that such a transfer would
benefit the community through increased economic development."
Libertarians agree with Justice Sandra Day O'Conner who accurately
noted in her dissenting opinion to this egregious ruling that the Court
has effectively deleted the words "for public use" from the "takings
clause" of the Fifth Amendment and thereby refused to properly enforce the
Federal Constitution.
Libertarians oppose the taking or seizure of private property by
government or by agencies acting upon governmental authority under any
circumstances. They also support compensation for owners whose property is
devalued or made inaccessible by government regulations.
However, Libertarians recognize such a power does exist. So did those
who framed the U.S. Constitution. That is why they wrote specific
restrictions on the Federal government's exercise of eminent domain, very
narrowly defining under what circumstances that power could be used.
Unfortunately, the Kelo decision has all but negated those restrictions.
Since North Carolina's statutes and state Constitution provide
inadequate measure for the protection of property rights, Libertarians
believe a constitutional amendment is necessary.
The text of the resolution follows:
Whereas, the protection of private property rights against government
seizures and other unreasonable government interference is a fundamental
principle and core commitment of our Nation's Founders; and
Whereas, On June 23, 2005, the United States Supreme Court issued its
decision in Kelo v. City of New London, which held that government may
seize the private property of one owner, and transfer that same property
to another private owner, simply by concluding that such a transfer would
benefit the community through increased economic development; and;
Whereas, the Court's decision in Kelo is alarming because, as Justice
Sandra Day O'Connor accurately noted in her dissenting opinion, the Court
has "effectively . . . delete[d] the words 'for public use' from the
Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment' and thereby 'refus[ed] to enforce
properly the Federal Constitution;'" and;
Whereas, the Court in Kelo noted, "nothing in our opinion precludes any
State from placing further restrictions on its exercise of the takings
power," and;
Whereas, the North Carolina Constitution contains inadequate
restrictions on the State's exercise of the power of eminent domain, in
that it does not specifically address the power, merely stating in Article
I, Section 19 that "No person shall be . deprived of his life, liberty, or
property, but by the law of the land;" and;
Whereas, the Libertarian Party of North Carolina opposes the taking or
seizure of private property by government or by agencies acting upon
governmental authority and supports compensation for owners whose property
is devalued or made inaccessible by government regulations;
We Therefore, The Libertarian Party Of North Carolina, support an
amendment to the North Carolina Constitution affirming the government's
role in the protection of private property rights. As seizure of
private property for the benefit of private interests is in direct
conflict with the government's role in protecting private property, we
call upon the legislature and citizens to amend the constitution to
prohibit in particular this form of taking.
s
|